Practice › Automated Decision Tools
NYC Local Law 144 — AEDT bias audit requirements take effect with July 2026 enforcement update
What the law is now
NYC Local Law 144 requires employers and employment agencies that use automated employment decision tools — software that substantially assists or replaces discretionary employment decisions — to conduct and publish independent bias audits of those tools before use and annually thereafter. Employers must also notify candidates that an AEDT is being used and provide an alternative assessment process on request.
What just shifted
What this adds: DCWP's June 2026 amendment clarifies that AI-powered resume screening, scoring, and ranking tools qualify as AEDTs even when a human reviewer makes the final selection, resolving prior ambiguity about tools that produce ranked candidate lists rather than yes/no outputs. The amendment also specifies that the bias audit must now include intersectional analysis across race-sex combinations, not just the single-axis categories in the original rule.
What this puts in question: Whether generative AI tools used to draft or evaluate interview questions, score interview recordings, or assess cover letters qualify as AEDTs — DCWP indicated guidance on this category is forthcoming.
What clients should weigh
Watch for
· EEOC AI and employment discrimination guidance, Q3 2026 expected
· Colorado SB 24-205 AEDT provisions, effective January 2027
· Illinois AIVA enforcement referrals, 2026 enforcement cycle
Ready to use
These are drafts. Edit before sending to a client.
Client alert
Draft — edit before sending to a client.
This corpus reflects one attorney's personal review. It is not a comprehensive survey. Verify scope and currency before relying on it for any matter.